Interpreting Statistical Models for Denominal Adjective Formation in Russian

Natalia Bobkova

References:

  1. Saleema Amershi, Andrew Begel, Christian Bird, Robert DeLIne, Harald Gall, Ece Kamar, Nachi Nagappan, Besmira Nushi, and Tom Zimmermann. Software Engineering for Machine Learning: A Case Study In International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2019) - Software Engineering in Practice track, IEEE Computer Society, 2019. (http://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-SEIP.2019.00042)
  2. Sabine Arndt-Lappe. Analogy in suffix rivalry: The case of English-ity and-ness English Language & Linguistics 18, pages 497–548, Cambridge University Press, 2014. (http://doi.org/10.1017/S136067431400015X)
  3. Mark Aronoff. Competition and the lexicon In Livelli di Analisi e fenomeni di interfaccia. Atti del XLVII congresso internazionale della Società Linguistica Italiana, pages 39–52, Bulzoni, 2016.
  4. Harald Baayen, Anna Endresen, Laura A Janda, Anastasia Makarova, and Tore Nesset. Making choices in Russian: Pros and cons of statistical methods for rival forms Russian linguistics 37, pages 253–291, Springer, 2013. (http://doi.org/10.1007/s11185-013-9118-6)
  5. Heike Baeskow. -ness and-ity: Phonological exponents of n or meaningful nominalizers of different adjectival domains? Journal of English Linguistics 40, pages 6–40, Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 2012. (http://doi.org/10.1177/0075424211405156)
  6. Gagan Bansal, Besmira Nushi, Ece Kamar, Dan Weld, Walter Lasecki, and Eric Horvitz. Updates in Human-AI Teams: Understanding and Addressing the Performance/Compatibility Tradeoff In AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2019. (http://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33012429)
  7. Natalia Bobkova and Fabio Montermini. Suffix rivalry in Russian: what low frequency words tell us In Mediterranean Morphology Meetings 12, pages 1–17, 2019.
  8. Natalia Bobkova. Statistical modelization of suffixal rivalry in Russian: adjectival formations in -sk- and -n- Corpus, Bases, corpus et langage-UMR 6039, 2022. (http://doi.org/10.4000/corpus.6580)
  9. Olivier Bonami and Juliette Thuilier. A statistical approach to rivalry in lexeme formation: French -iser and -ifier Word Structure 11, 2018.
  10. Don Chapman and Royal Skousen. Analogical modeling and morphological change: the case of the adjectival negative prefix in English English Language & Linguistics 9, pages 333–357, Cambridge University Press, 2005. (http://doi.org/10.1017/S136067430500167X)
  11. Bernard Fradin. L'interprétation des nominalisations en N-age et N-ment en français In Actes du XXVIIe congrès international de linguistique et philologie romanes (Nancy, 15-20 juillet 2013), Société de linguistique romane/Eliphi, 2016.
  12. Pavel Graščenkov. Grammatika prilagatel'nogo. Tipologija ad"ektivnosti i atributivnosti, Litres, 2019.
  13. Ljudmila Graudina, Viktor Ickovič, and Lija Katlinskaja. Grammatičeskaja pravil'nost' russkoj reči: stilističeskij slovar' varintov, Nauka, 2001.
  14. Matías Guzmán Naranjo. Analogical classification in formal grammar, Language Science Press, 2019.
  15. Nabil Hathout. Une approche topologique de la construction des mots: propositions théoriques et application à la préfixation en anti Des unités morphologiques au lexique, pages 251–318, Hermès/Lavoisier Paris, 2011.
  16. Christine Hénault and Sergue Sakhno. Çem supermarket-n-yj luçşe supermarket-sk-ogo? Slovoobrazovatel'naja sinonimija v russkix ad"ektivnyj neologizmax po dannym interneta B. Tošovic, A. Wonisch. Wortbildung und Internet, Institut für Slawistik, 2015.
  17. Richard Huyghe and Marine Wauquier. Distributional semantics insights on agentive suffix rivalry in French Word Structure 14, pages 354–391, Edinburgh University Press The Tun-Holyrood Road, 12 (2f) Jackson's Entry …, 2021. (http://doi.org/10.3366/word.2021.0194)
  18. Vsevolod Kapatsinski. Velar palatalization in Russian and artificial grammar: Constraints on models of morphophonology Laboratory phonology 1, pages 361–393, De Gruyter, 2010. (http://doi.org/10.1515/labphon.2010.019)
  19. David King, Andrea Sims, and Micha Elsner. Interpreting sequence-to-sequence models for Russian inflectional morphology In Proceedings of the Society for Computation in Linguistics 2020, pages 409–418, 2020.
  20. Kustova. Prilagatel'nye Materialy k korpusnoj grammatike russkogo jazyka. Vyp.3. Časti reči i leksiko-grammatičeskie klassy, pages 40-107, Sankt Peterburg: Nestor-Istorija, 2018.
  21. Stéphanie Lignon. –iser and –ifier suffixations in French: Verify data to verize hypotheses? In Décembrettes 7, 2010.
  22. Mark Lindsay and Mark Aronoff. Natural selection in self-organizing morphological systems In Morphology in Toulouse. Selected Proceedings of Décembrettes 7 (Toulouse 2-3 December 2010), pages 133–153, Lincom Europa, 2013.
  23. Alice Missud and Florence Villoing. The morphology of rival-ion,-age and-ment selected verbal bases Dany Amiot Delphine Tribout, pages 29, 2020.
  24. Matías Guzmán Naranjo. Analogy, complexity and predictability in the Russian nominal inflection system Morphology 30, pages 219–262, Springer, 2020. (http://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-020-09367-1)
  25. Matías Guzmán Naranjo and Olivier Bonami. Comparing derivational processes with distributional semantics ParadigMo II, pages 25, 2021.
  26. Besmira Nushi, Ece Kamar, and Eric Horvitz. Towards Accountable AI: Hybrid Human-Machine Analyses for Characterizing System Failure In HCOMP 2018, AAAI, 2018.
  27. Jeff Parker and Andrea Sims. Irregularity, paradigmatic layers, and the complexity of inflection class systems: A study of Russian nouns InP. Arkadiev & F. Gardani Eds. The Complexities of Morphology, 2019. (http://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198861287.003.0002)
  28. Marc Plénat. Enquête sur divers effets des contraintes dissimilatives en français In Des unités morphologiques au lexique. Paris: Hermès-Lavoisier, pages 145–190, 2011.
  29. Vladimir Plungjan, Tat'jana Reznikova, and Dmitrij Sičinava. Nacional'nyj korpus russogo jazyka: obščaja xarakteristika Naučno-texničeskaja informacija. Serija 2: Informacionnye processy i sistemy, pages 9–13, Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение науки Всероссийский …, 2005.
  30. Michel Roché. Quel traitement unifié pour les dérivations en-isme et en-iste? In Des unités morphologiques au lexique. Paris: Hermès-Lavoisier, pages 69–143, Hermès-Lavoisier, 2011.
  31. Skipper Seabold and Josef Perktold. statsmodels: Econometric and statistical modeling with python In 9th Python in Science Conference, 2010. (http://doi.org/10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-011)
  32. Andrea Sims. Slavic morphology: Recent approaches to classic problems, illustrated with Russian Journal of Slavic Linguistics 25, pages 489–524, JSTOR, 2017. (http://doi.org/10.1353/jsl.2017.0019)
  33. Megha Srivastava, Besmira Nushi, Ece Kamar, Shital Shah, and Eric Horvitz. An Empirical Analysis of Backward Compatibility in Machine Learning Systems In KDD, 2020. (http://doi.org/10.1145/3394486.3403379)
  34. Natal'ja Švedova. Russkaja grammatika 1, Moskva: Nauka, 1980.
  35. Juliette Thuilier. Contraintes préférentielles et ordre des mots en français, 2012.
  36. Alan Timberlake. A reference grammar of Russian, Cambridge University Press, 2004.
  37. Charles Edward Townsend. Russian word-formation, Slavica Publishers, 1975.
  38. Rossella Varvara. Constraints on nominalizations: Investigating the productivity domain of Italian-mento and-zione Zeitschrift für Wortbildung/Journal of Word Formation 4, pages 78–99, Peter Lang Academic Publishing Group, 2020. (http://doi.org/10.3726/zwjw.2020.02.05)
  39. Marine Wauquier. Confrontation des procédés dérivationnels et des catégories sémantiques dans les modèles distributionnels, 2020.
  40. Andrej Zaliznjak. Grammatičeskij slovar' russkogo jazyka, Russkie slovari, 2003.
  41. Elena Zemskaya. Jazyk kak dejatel'nost'. Morfema, slovo, reč, Moskva: Flinta, 2015.