Derivations and Connections: Word Formation in the LiLa Knowledge Base of Linguistic Resources for Latin

Eleonora Litta, Marco Passarotti, Francesco Mambrini


  1. Steven Bird and Mark Liberman. A formal framework for linguistic annotation Speech communication 33, pages 23–60, Elsevier, 2001. (
  2. James P Blevins. Word and paradigm morphology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2016. (
  3. Geert Booij. Construction morphology Language and linguistics compass 4, pages 543–555, Wiley Online Library, 2010. (
  4. Marco Budassi and Eleonora Litta. In Trouble with the Rules. Theoretical Issues Raised by the Insertion of -sc- Verbs into Word Formation Latin. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Resources and Tools for Derivational Morphology (DeriMo), pages 15–26, Educatt, 2017.
  5. Marco Budassi and Marco Passarotti. Nomen Omen. Enhancing the Latin Morphological Analyser Lemlat with an Onomasticon In Proceedings of the 10th SIGHUM Workshop on Language Technology for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, and Humanities (LaTeCH), pages 90–94, Association for Computational Linguistics, Berlin, Germany, 2016. (
  6. Paul Buitelaar, Philipp Cimiano, John McCrae, Elena Montiel-Ponsoda, and Thierry Declerck. Ontology lexicalisation: The lemon perspective In WS 2 Workshop Extended Abstracts, 9th International Conference on Terminology and Artificial Intelligence, pages 33–36, 2011.
  7. Flavio Massimiliano Cecchini, Marco Passarotti, Paolo Ruffolo, Marinella Testori, Lia Draetta, Martina Fieromonte, Annarita Liano, Costanza Marini, and Giovanni Piantanida. Enhancing the Latin Morphological Analyser LEMLAT with a Medieval Latin Glossary. In Proceedings of the Fifth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics (CLiC-it 2018). 10-12 December 2018, Torino, pages 87–92, aAccademia university press, 2018. (
  8. Christian Chiarcos. Interoperability of corpora and annotations In Linked Data in Linguistics, pages 161–179, Springer, 2012. (
  9. Christian Chiarcos and Maria Sukhareva. OLiA - Ontologies of Linguistic Annotation Semantic Web Journal 6, pages 379–386, 2015. (
  10. Christian Chiarcos and Christian Fäth. CoNLL-RDF: Linked Corpora Done in an NLP-Friendly Way In Language, Data, and Knowledge, pages 74–88, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017. (
  11. Michiel de Vaan. Etymological Dictionary of Latin: and the other Italic Languages, Brill, Amsterdam, 2008.
  12. Thierry Declerck, Piroska Lendvai, Karlheinz Mörth, Gerhard Budin, and Tamás Váradi. Towards linked language data for digital humanities In Linked Data in Linguistics, pages 109–116, Springer, 2012. (
  13. Mark Domenig and Pius ten Hacken. Word Manager: A system for morphological dictionaries 1, Georg Olms Verlag AG, Hildesheim, 1992.
  14. Egidio Forcellini. Totius latinitatis lexicon: Onomasticon ; 1 (A - B), Typis Aldinianis, 1867.
  15. Karl Ernst Georges. Ausführliches Lateinisch-Deutsches Handwörterbuch, Hannover: Hahn, 1913.
  16. Peter GW Glare. Oxford Latin dictionary, Clarendon Press. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1982.
  17. Otto Gradenwitz. Laterculi Vocum Latinarum, Verlag Von S. Hirzel, Leipzig, 1904.
  18. Dag TT Haug and Marius Jøhndal. Creating a parallel treebank of the old Indo-European Bible translations In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Language Technology for Cultural Heritage Data (LaTeCH 2008), pages 27–34, Marrakesh, Morocco, 2008.
  19. Sebastian Hellmann, Jens Lehmann, Sören Auer, and Martin Brümmer. Integrating NLP using Linked Data In 12th International Semantic Web Conference, Sydney, Australia, October 21-25, 2013, pages , 2013. (
  20. Charles F. Hockett. Two Models of Grammatical Description Words 10, pages 210–231, 1954. (
  21. Nancy Ide and James Pustejovsky. What does interoperability mean, anyway Toward an Operational, 2010.
  22. Fahad Khan. Towards the Representation of Etymological and Diachronic Lexical Data on the Semantic Web In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018), European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Miyazaki, Japan, 2018.
  23. Chantal Kircher-Durand. Syntax, morphology and semantics in the structuring of the Latin lexicon, as illustrated in the -lis derivatives In New Studies in Latin Linguistics, Proceedings of the 4th International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, Cambridge, April 1987, John Benjamins, Cambridge, 1991.
  24. Timo Korkiakangas and Marco Passarotti. Challenges in annotating medieval Latin charters Journal for Language Technology and Computational Linguistics 26, pages 103-114, 2011.
  25. Ora Lassila, Ralph R. Swick, World Wide, and Web Consortium. Resource Description Framework (RDF) Model and Syntax Specification, 1998.
  26. Eleonora Litta, Marco Passarotti, and Francesco Mambrini. The Treatment of Word Formation in the LiLa Knowledge Base of Linguistic Resources for Latin In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Resources and Tools for Derivational Morphology, pages 35–43, Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics, Prague, Czechia, 2019.
  27. Eleonora Litta. On the Use of Latin -bilis Adjectives across Time Quaderni Borromaici. Saggi studi proposte 6, pages 149–62, 2019.
  28. Eleonora Litta and Marco Passarotti. (When) inflection needs derivation: a word formation lexicon for Latin In Words and Sounds, pages 224–239, De Gruyter, Berlin, Boston, 2019. (
  29. Francesco Mambrini and Marco Passarotti. Representing Etymology in the LiLa Knowledge Base of Linguistic Resources for Latin In Proceedings of the 2020 Globalex Workshop on Linked Lexicography, pages 20–28, European Language Resources Association, Marseille, France, 2020.
  30. Francesco Mambrini and Marco Passarotti. Harmonizing Different Lemmatization Strategies for Building a Knowledge Base of Linguistic Resources for Latin In Proceedings of the 13th Linguistic Annotation Workshop, pages 71–80, Association for Computational Linguistics, Florence, Italy, 2019. (
  31. John P. McCrae, Julia Bosque-Gil, Jorge Gracia, Paul Buitelaar, and Philipp Cimiano. The OntoLex-Lemon Model: development and applications In Proceedings of eLex 2017, pages 587–597, 2017.
  32. Marco Passarotti. Language resources. The state of the art of Latin and the \textitIndex Thomisticus treebank project In Corpus anciens et Bases de données, pages 301–320, Presses universitaires de Nancy, Nancy, France, 2011.
  33. Marco Passarotti, Marco Budassi, Eleonora Litta, and Paolo Ruffolo. The Lemlat 3.0 Package for Morphological Analysis of Latin In Proceedings of the NoDaLiDa 2017 Workshop on Processing Historical Language, pages 24–31, 2017.
  34. Eric Prud’Hommeaux, Andy Seaborne, and others. SPARQL query language for RDF. W3C Internet:[Accessed on February 27th, 2019], 2008.
  35. Maciej Sumalvico. Unsupervised Learning of Morphology with Graph Sampling In Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP 2017), Varna, Bulgaria, 2017. (
  36. Paul Tombeur. Thesaurus formarum totius latinitatis a Plauto usque ad saeculum XXum, Brepols, Turnhout, Belgium, 1998.
  37. Eleonora Litta and Marco Budassi. What we talk about when we talk about paradigms In Paradigmatic relations in derivational morphology, Forthcoming.