4.2. Topic-focus articulation and the semantic type of dependency relation (functor)

The semantic type of dependency relation (i.e. functor) can be helpful in annotating the contextual boundness of a modification. Modifications with certain functors are usually contextually bound, while modifications with other functors tend to be contextually non-bound.

There are the following tendencies in the relationship between topic-focus articulation and functors:

The behaviour of the so-called rhematizers (functor=RHEM) is very specific and we describe it in Section 6, "Rhematizers".

Figure 10.14. Topic-focus articulation and the semantic type of dependency relation (functor)

Topic-focus articulation and the semantic type of dependency relation (functor)

Naštěstí přišel. (=lit. Fortunately (he) came.)

Figure 10.15. Topic-focus articulation and the semantic type of dependency relation (functor)

Topic-focus articulation and the semantic type of dependency relation (functor)

Jirko, podej mi pero. (=lit. George, pass me (the) pen.)

Figure 10.16. Topic-focus articulation and the semantic type of dependency relation (functor)

Topic-focus articulation and the semantic type of dependency relation (functor)

Ve starém parku stál starý dům. (=lit. In (an) old park stood (an) old house.)

Figure 10.17. Topic-focus articulation and the semantic type of dependency relation (functor)

Topic-focus articulation and the semantic type of dependency relation (functor)

Rychle přišel. (=lit. Quickly (he) came.)

Figure 10.18. Topic-focus articulation and the semantic type of dependency relation (functor)

Topic-focus articulation and the semantic type of dependency relation (functor)

Škola šachových koncovek (=lit. School of_chess ending_games.)